What can happen to any case based on unlawfully gathered PIR?

When it comes to unlawfully gathered Priority Intelligence Requirements (PIR), the most likely consequence is that the case will be dismissed by the courts. This is rooted in the legal principle that evidence obtained through illegal means, such as without a warrant or probable cause, violates an individual's rights and, therefore, cannot be used in a court of law. This principle is designed to uphold the integrity of the justice system and protect citizens from unlawful searches and seizures.

If evidence is deemed unlawfully obtained, it often leads judges to exclude that evidence from the case altogether. Consequently, if the core evidence supporting the charges is inadequate without the unlawfully gathered PIR, the court has grounds to dismiss the case due to lack of sufficient evidence. Furthermore, this dismissal serves to deter law enforcement from engaging in unlawful evidence-gathering practices in the future, reinforcing the importance of adhering to legal protocols.

While penalties and fines can be associated with unlawful evidence gathering in other contexts, dismissal is the most direct and likely outcome regarding the case itself.