During GRT operations, the subject of the investigation should be referred to as what?

In Ground Reconnaissance and Tracking (GRT) operations, referring to the subject of the investigation as a "Person/group of interest" is appropriate because it reflects a neutral stance in which the individual or group has not yet been determined to be hostile or guilty. This term allows for ongoing observation and data collection without jumping to conclusions or labeling the subject prematurely.

Using "Person/group of interest" also conveys a degree of professionalism and objectivity, which is crucial in reconnaissance operations where gathering accurate information is essential for making informed decisions. This language keeps the focus on the investigation and the intelligence being gathered, rather than assigning a negative connotation that might impede thorough analysis or operational integrity.

In contrast, terms like "enemy," "target," or "suspect" suggest a pre-determined judgment about the individual's intentions or actions, which can hinder the ability to gather unbiased information. Such labels can lead to assumptions that are not always justified and could compromise the mission objectives or the safety of the personnel involved.